Five fast food from liberal leadership discussions in Canada

After successive discussions in both English and French, the candidates replaced Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the leader of the liberal party in Canada to voters.

The liberals who tend to the cards now will choose between the former ruler of Canada and England, Mark Carney, former Finance Minister Christia Frayland, the leader of the government government, Kareena Gold and former businessman Frank Pelis.

Whoever wins the vote on March 9 will become the next Prime Minister in Canada and will lead the liberals in the upcoming general elections, which must be held on October 20 this year or before.

The great focus in discussions was how Canada should respond to US President Donald Trump, who threatened the sharp tariffs on the northern American neighbor and indicated that Canada became “State 51”.

Here are five fast food from the liberal leadership discussions.

How Canada should respond to what many called “existential threat” from US President Donald Trump, who dominated the agenda in both discussions.

Trump said he intends to impose a 25 % tariff on all Canadian exports, with the exception of the energy that will be targeted by 10 % – a step that economists will be devastating for Canada with the increase in Americans’ prices.

It has also been repeatedly suggested that the United States should include Canada, which was caused by warning and anger at large areas of Canadian population.

Frieland, a former previous minister who served during the first period of Trump, put herself as a fighter experience – and won – against the American president and his previous definition.

But Carney warned that Trump today was not the past Trump. “He is more isolated. It’s more aggressive,” Carney said. “In the past, he wanted our markets. Now he wants our country.”

Gold, the youngest candidate, suggested that “Canada” put everything on the table “to protect its sovereignty, and that the federal government should help companies diversify their governor to rely less on the United States.

Meanwhile, Baylis said that Canada needed to formulate closer economic relations with the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia, saying that all of the four countries were similar in thinking with values, culture and joint government regimes.

Trump’s threats have become more worrying about the current economic situation in Canada.

Canadians have expressed his frustration due to the high cost of living.

Carney – a trade expert via trade – promised a plan that balances Canada’s operating budget in three years and suggested that Canada rethink the way it spends its money.

But he also noticed his support for major liberal programs, such as child care at reasonable prices and dental care.

When the former finance minister defended, Frieland defended her busy record, saying that financial affairs in the country are still “very strong.” She added that Canada should benefit from increasing patriotism in the face of Trump’s threats, using this momentum to support Canadian industries and enhance job growth.

Pelis relied on his experience as a businessman saying that Canada must work to build its productivity.

On the other hand, Gold said that the liberal party should be “realistic with Canadians” and that the budget budget in three years was not possible without significant discounts, which it did not support. She said that Canada should focus instead on “updating the social safety network” to help those who struggle.

“We are facing severe threats from the United States, so we have to be able to invest in our employees and our businesses to protect them,” said Gold.

The four candidates were discussing with each other, but they often presented a unified front against their joint opponent, the leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Boelifer, who prefers his party in the polls as the most vulnerable to the formation of the next Canada government.

The liberal leadership cast hope in many strikes in Poilievre during the discussion. Gold called “our small copy of Trump here at home,” while Frieland said Poilievre was looking to “imitate” Trump.

Carney criticized Poilievre as “irresponsible” and added that Canada cannot “cannot bear” to have a prime minister.

Poilievre, who enjoyed great progress in the polls before Trudeau was unpopular, was to burn his stadium to the Canadians since Trudeau’s resignation.

His message changed from the criticism of the Prime Minister sitting for his “broken” leadership Canada to put “Canada first” in the face of threats from the United States. He also focused his focus on attacking Carney, who prefers to win the liberal leadership race.

Poilievre still falls behind nationally, but some opinion polls indicate that the forefront between him and the liberals has shrunk since Trudeau left.

In response to a change in the American policy on the war of Russia and the ongoing Krin, the four candidates affirmed their commitment to continue Canada’s support for Ukraine.

All of them supported the need for Canada to reach the goal of military spending by 2 % as stipulated in its obligations to the NATO alliance, although they opposed the schedule and how to get there.

Frieland said Canada should reach the goal by 2027, and it should do so by investing in the “generation of war”. Baylis and Carney said that their plan would be to reach this goal by 2030.

Freland and Carney said that Canada needs to invest this money in Canadian military projects instead of the United States.

Freeland has noticed that Canada should reduce its dependence on the United States, and should look forward to working with the European Union and other NATO partners on security assurances.

The carbon tax for consumers and companies was the cornerstone of the Trudo government’s policy on climate change.

But this tax has proven that it is unpopular with the Canadians, forcing Carney and Frayland to the promise that they would get rid of politics.

Carney, a former United Nations envoy at work and finance, has long been a pro -carbon tax. However, in discussions, he acknowledged that consumers’ tax has become exciting to the dispute, and he said that he would instead focus on imposing taxes on major pollutants and increasing clean energy projects in Canada.

Frieland, who resigned from the Trudeau government due to differences with the prime minister in spending, said that history will judge his climate work positively despite the infection of his policies. But she also pledged to cancel the carbon tax.

“Democracy revolves around listening to people, and the Canadians were very clear with us that they do not believe that politics has succeeded for them,” she said.

On the other hand, Gold and Bileis said that they will retain some of the carbon consumer tax in place, saying that control of climate change comes at a price.